As the lockdown from the Coronavirus pandemic ends, provincial and federal governments will still face the reality that arrived in its wake: a recession, and one made worse by a domestic energy sector that never really recovered from multiple previous injuries already in play. They included: The Saudi-directed oil price crash in 2014 (and now one in 2020); and the domestic and foreign rhetorical attacks on Canada’s oil sands, supported only by a minority of Canadians, but which helped prevent multiple projects and pipelines from getting built.   

Rather than again ponder the exact impact of such anti-oil and gas efforts here, consider what other energy-rich countries have been up to while Canada’s ability to extract resources and ship them to markets, especially non-American ports, was stuck in the sludge of anti-energy protests and regulatory morass. 

To grasp this, let’s consider natural gas and with a worldwide view from 2000 to 2017 (the latest year for annual data available by country, from the U.S. Energy Information Administration). In those years, worldwide natural gas consumption soared by 52 percent while the same U.S. agency, pre-pandemic, forecast another 40 percent rise by 2050.  

The short-term outlook for natural gas use has weakened because of the Coronavirus. However, the consulting firm Wood Macenzkie forecasts a recovery in natural gas demand, driven by demand in Asia. If so, this would mimic past natural gas demand patterns since 2000, where worldwide demand dropped only once, amidst the 2008/09 financial crisis, and then recovered.  

However, here’s the problem for those who care both about the economy and emissions, be they carbon or particulate, and the potential for LNG to help drive down both types of emissions: Canada was absent from the recent boom in natural gas around the world. The country will again be absent from the next one—and all its investment, jobs, and incomes—unless premiers such as British Columbia’s John Horgan whose province has a significant government revenue interest in LNG exports, can more successfully thwart the minority of Canadians who actively undermine oil and gas development.   

Some history: When natural gas consumption soared worldwide between 2000 and 2017, so too did production, up 51 percent. Exports rose in tandem, higher by 79 per cent.      

While Canada was still among the top six exporters of natural gas in 2017, it was mostly absent from the boom because its main export market, the United States, produced 42 percent more natural gas in 2017 when compared with 2000. That dampened down U.S. need for Canadian gas.  

While U.S. natural gas production soared, Canada failed to secure new export markets offshore. It is why Canadian domestic production of natural gas was down 13 percent in 2017 relative to 2000, and why gas exports were down by 17 percent. 

Canada was an anomaly. With a look at natural gas export gains by Canada’s major competitors, here’s the record when 2017 is compared with 2000: Russia (up 13 percent); Norway (up 146 percent); Australia (up 562); Qatar (up 801 percent) and the United States, where exports of natural gas soared by 1200 percent.     

Australia, Qatar, and the United States exported far less natural gas in 2000 than did Canada so the 2017 comparisons to 2000 are stark. But that’s rather the point: In 2000, the United States, Australia and Qatar together exported just 1,102 billion cubic feet (bcf) of natural gas. That was less than a third of what Canada exported (3,756 bcf) that year.  

Thus those three countries, along with Norway and Russia, all carved out competitive advantages (Australia in Asia, Russia and Qatar in Europe) while Canada’s potential was hamstrung care of activists, some recalcitrant politicians and a laborious regulatory process that scares off investment. Moreover, the opposition to fossil fuels such as natural gas is driven by magical thinking and is against all empirical evidence according to Bill Gates and energy expert Vaclav Smil—i.e., that the world can do without the industrial economy powered by just such energy.  

Self-harm is never a viable strategy for a positive future but that is unfortunately the end goal for some who oppose natural gas extraction, production, and export. The reality is that beyond any temporary downturn in consumption, Canada’s main competitors for LNG exports will continue to attract investment and thus flourish with ever-more jobs and incomes, and receive a cornucopia of tax revenues.  

The only question is whether Canadians and their elected governments will allow a minority of anti-reality activists to help thwart the next boom in natural gas just as they helped Canada miss out on the last one.   

Mark Milke is executive director of research and Lennie Kaplan is chief research analyst at the Canadian Energy Centre, an Alberta government corporation funded in part by taxes paid by industry on carbon emissions. They are authors of Missing out: Natural gas and Canada’s exports.